PR No. 12/2014
SEBI Board Meeting
The SEBI Board met in New Delhi today
and inter-alia took the following important decisions:
I. Review of Corporate Governance norms in India for listed companies
The
Board has approved the proposals to amend the Listing Agreement with
respect to corporate governance norms for listed companies. The
amendments, inter-alia, propose to align the provisions of Listing
Agreement with the provisions of the newly enacted Companies Act, 2013
and also provide additional requirements to strengthen the corporate
governance framework for listed companies in India. The amendments shall
be made applicable to all listed companies with effect from October 01, 2014.
The Board approved the following proposals:
(i) Exclusion of nominee Director from the definition of Independent Director
(ii) Compulsory whistle blower
mechanism
(iii) Expanded role of Audit Committee
(iv) Prohibition of stock options to Independent Directors
(v) Separate meeting of Independent Directors
(vi) Constitution of Stakeholders Relationship Committee
(vii) Enhanced disclosure of remuneration policies
(viii) Performance evaluation of Independent Directors and the Board of Directors
(ix) Prior approval of Audit Committee for all material Related Party Transactions (RPTs)
(x) Approval of all material RPTs by shareholders through special resolution with related parties abstaining from
voting
(xi) Mandatory constitution of Nomination and
Remuneration Committee. Chairman of the said committees shall be
independent.
(xii) At least one woman director on the Board of the company
(xiii)
It has been decided that the maximum number of Boards an independent
director can serve on listed companies be restricted to 7 and 3 in case
the person is serving as a whole time director in a listed company
(xiv)
To restrict the total tenure of an Independent Director to 2 terms of 5
years. However, if a person who has already served as an Independent
Director for 5 years or more in a listed company as on the date on which
the amendment to Listing Agreement becomes effective, he shall be
eligible for appointment for one more term of 5 years
only.
(xv) The scope of the definition of RPT has been widened to include elements of Companies Act and Accounting Standards.
In
addition to the above, the Board also approved the proposal to put in
place principles of Corporate Governance, policy on dealing with RPTs,
divestment of material subsidiaries, disclosure of letter of appointment
of Independent Directors and the letter of resignation of all
directors, risk management, providing training to Independent Directors,
E-voting facility by top 500 companies by market capitalization for all
shareholder resolutions and Boards of companies to satisfy themselves
that plans are in place for orderly succession for appointments to the
Board and senior management.
II. Long Term Policy for Mutual Funds in India
SEBI
Board has approved a Long Term Policy for Mutual Funds in India. The
long term policy includes all aspects - including enhancing the reach
and promoting financial inclusion, tax treatment, obligation of various
stakeholders, etc. to deal with the public policy objectives of
achieving sustainable growth of the mutual fund industry and
mobilisation of household savings for the growth of the economy. The
recommendations of long term policy has been bifurcated in two buckets,
tax incentive related proposals and non-tax related proposals.
(a) Tax related proposals:
The
objective of giving tax benefits is to incentivize and channelize
savings into long term investment products. Schemes offering tax
benefits are a powerful approach world over that helps channelize
household savings into long term investment products. The tax incentives
for Mutual Fund schemes are recommended as under:
(i)
A long term product such as Mutual Fund Linked Retirement Plan (MFLRP)
with additional tax incentive of Rs.50,000/- under 80C of Income Tax Act
may be introduced.
(ii) Alternatively, the limit of
section 80C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, may be enhanced from INR 1 lakh
to INR 2 lakh to make mutual funds products (ELSS, MFLRP etc.) as
priority for investors among the different investment avenues. RGESS may
also be brought under
this enhanced limit.
(iii) Similar to
merger/consolidation of companies, the merger/consolidation of equity
mutual funds schemes also may not be treated as transfer and therefore,
may be exempted from capital gain taxation.
(b) Non-Tax incentive proposals:
In
the long run, the objective is to ensure that Mutual Funds achieve a
reasonable size and play an important role in achieving the objective of
financial inclusion while further enhancing the transparency so that
investors can take informed decision. Towards this objective the
following has been decided:
(i) Capital Adequacy i.e. minimum networth of the Asset Management Companies (AMC) be increased to INR50
crore.
(ii) The concept of seed capital to be
introduced i.e. 1% of the amount raised (subject to a maximum of Rs.50
lacs) to be invested by AMCs in all the open ended schemes during its
life time.
(iii) EPFOs be allowed to invest upto 15%
of their corpus in Equities and Mutual Funds. Further, the members of
EPFOs who are earning more than INR6500 per month be offered an option
for a part of their corpus to be invested in a Mutual Fund product of
their choice.
(iv) Presently, Navratna and Miniratna
Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) are permitted to invest in
Public Sector Mutual Funds regulated by SEBI. It has been recommended
that all CPSEs be allowed to choose from any of the SEBI registered
Mutual Funds for investing their surplus
funds.
(v) In order to enhance transparency and
improve the quality of the disclosures, it has been decided that AUM
from different categories of schemes such as equity schemes, debt
schemes, etc., AUM from B-15 cities, contribution of sponsor and its
associates in AUM of schemes of their mutual fund, AUM garnered through
sponsor group/ non-sponsor group distributors etc. are to be disclosed
on monthly basis on respective website of AMCs and on consolidated basis
on website of AMFI.
(vi) In order to improve
transparency as well as encourage Mutual Funds to diligently participate
in corporate governance of the investee companies and exercise their
voting rights in the best interest of the unit holders, voting data
along with rationale supporting their decision (for, against or abstain)
be disclosed on quarterly basis on their
website. This is to be certified by Auditor annually and reviewed by
board of AMC and Trustees.
(vii) Towards achieving the
goal of financial inclusion, a gradual approach to be taken such that
initially the banked population of the country may be targeted with
respect to Mutual Funds investing. SEBI will work towards achieving the
goal that the basics of capital markets and financial planning may be
introduced as core curriculum in schools and colleges. Printed
literature on Mutual Funds in regional languages be mandatorily made
available by Mutual Funds. Investor awareness campaign in print and
electronic media on Mutual Funds in regional languages to be introduced.
(viii)
In order to develop and enhance the distribution network PSU banks may
be encouraged to distribute schemes of all Mutual Funds. Online
investment facility need to be enhanced to tap the
internet savvy users to invest in Mutual Funds. Also, the burgeoning
mobile-only internet users need to be tapped for direct distribution of
Mutual Funds products.
The proposals relating to tax
incentives, allowing EPFO to invest in equities/mutual funds and
allowing all CPSEs to invest their surplus fund in mutual funds will be
sent to the Government for its decision.
III. Amendment to SEBI {KYC (Know Your Client) Registration Agency} Regulations, 2011
SEBI
(KYC Registration Agency) system ('KRA system') has evolved and
stabilized over a period of two years and with inter-operability in
place, there is easy exchange of KYC data among five SEBI registered
KRAs. The client who has already done the KYC with any SEBI
registered intermediary need not undergo the same process again when he
approaches another intermediary. The system has benefited the investors
as well as the intermediaries.
However, as per existing KRA
Regulations, there is an option available to the intermediary that he
may access the centralised KRA system in case of a client who is already
KYC compliant or carry our fresh KYC process. As the KRA system has
been working well, it is felt that there may not be a need to provide
this option in the Regulations.
Board has now approved the amendment to KRA Regulations and the option of taking fresh KYC has been done away with. However, as provided in the Regulations, the intermediary can undertake enhanced KYC measures commensurate with the risk profile of its clients.
Board has now approved the amendment to KRA Regulations and the option of taking fresh KYC has been done away with. However, as provided in the Regulations, the intermediary can undertake enhanced KYC measures commensurate with the risk profile of its clients.
This would further facilitate the KYC process for the investors.