FII limit in domestic debt raised by $ 10 bn
|
BS REPORTER
New Delhi, 30 November
To attract long- term investments into the debt market and to narrow the current account deficit, the finance ministry today raised the foreign institutional investor ( FII) limits in government securities and corporate bonds by $ 5 billion (₹ 27,600 crore) each.
The additional $ 10 billion would raise the total FII investment limit allowed in a year in domestic debt to $ 75 billion (₹ 4.14 lakh crore).
The high- level committee on external commercial borrowing, headed by economic affairs secretary Arvind Mayaram, took the decision, to encourage long- term foreign funds into the Indian debt market.
According to ministry officials, the $ 5- billion window in government securities would be without any stipulated residual maturity. It would be open to pension funds, central banks and sovereign wealth funds. The other $ 5- billion segment would be open for corporate bonds.
This overall limit of $ 75 billion in domestic debt is distributed through a host of categories across government, corporate and infrastructure debt. The guidelines in this regard would be notified in a week to 10 days by the Reserve Bank of India.
Move to attract long- term investments into the debt market
|
IPO market set to buzz in December
|
SAMIE MODAK
Mumbai, 30 November
The primary market for equities is promising to end with a bang in an otherwise dull 2012.
Four companies, including Bharti Infratel and CARE Ratings, are set to raise close to ₹ 5,700 crore through initial public offerings ( IPOs) over the next couple of weeks, as issuers seek to cash in on the cheerful investor sentiment in the stock markets.
The ₹ 4,500- crore IPO of Bharti, which will open on December 11, would be the largest issue since Coal India’s ₹ 15,000- crore share sale in October 2010. The amount proposed to be raised by Bharti, which has priced its issue in the range of ₹ 210- 240 apiece, is almost four times the money raised through IPOs in 2012.
CARE Ratings and PC Jeweller, also planning IPOs in the next couple of weeks, aim to raise ₹ 1,000 crore.
Bankers to the issues, however, are a tad worried if the market has the appetite to absorb these issues, especially as Rural Electrification Corporation ( REC) and NMDC are also aiming to raise almost ₹ 11,000 crore in the same period. Seven IPOs ( barring issues by small and medium enterprises) have raised ₹ 1,500 crore in 2012. To add to this, REC would launch a ₹ 4,500- crore tax- free bond issue during the first week of December, and state- owned NMDC is planning a ₹ 6,500- crore offer for sale in the second week of December. The flurry of primary market activity has raised some doubts as to all the six issues sailing through comfortably.
“At this late stage in the year, getting deals over the line can prove to be tricky,” said Tarun Kataria, chief executive officer, Religare Capital Markets.
“FIIs ( foreign institutional investors) tend to wind down and DIIs ( domestic institutional investors) have little new AUMs ( assets under management). In an environment like this, valuations need to be compelling.” What is making issuers and bankers confident of pushing through the issues is that foreign institutional inflows have not slowed. “ Given that FIIs have invested over $ 19 billion into the market this year, absorbing $ 1 billion won’t be difficult.
All IPOs this year have made money for investors,” said V Jayasankar, head of equity capital markets, Kotak Investment Banking, a banker to Bharti’s IPO.
Echoing Jayasankar, S Subramaniam, managing director of Axis Capital, another banker to the Bharti issue, said, “ There have been years in the mid- 90s when the market has seen new issuances of 10 per cent of market capitalisation, that too without much participation by FIIs.” Brokers said FIIs and local investors are unlikely to shun the issues just because it is the year- end. “ There is appetite to absorb all these issues, but the key is pricing and quality,” said Nirmal Jain, chairman, IIFL.
Bharti Infratel’s ₹ 4,500- crore share sale to be the largest since Coal India’s in 2010 GOING PUBLIC
Four issues will hit the market in the first two weeks of December
Approx Launch issue size Issue date (₹ cr) price (₹)
Bharti Infratel Dec 11 4,534 210- 240 CARE Ratings Dec 07 540 700- 750 PC Jeweller Dec 10 585 130 Veto Switchgears Dec 03 25 48- 50
Source: Banks and companies ₹ 5,684 crore
Approximate issue size
MARKETS, P6
>Bharti Infratel IPO opens on Dec 10 > Nuclear Power Corp to be listed
|
Friday, November 30, 2012
Business standard news update 1-12-2012
Thursday, November 29, 2012
business standard updates 30-11-2012
Lok Sabha approves changes in money laundering rule
|
BS REPORTER & PTI
New Delhi, 29 November
The Lok Sabha today approved the Prevention of Money Laundering ( Amendment) Bill, 2011, enlarging the definition of money laundering offences and making provisions for much larger penalty, commensurate with the proportion of the committed offence.
The Bill sought to remove the existing limit of ₹ 5 lakh as fine under the Act.
Finance Minister PChidambaram moved the Bill for consideration, which includes activities such as cheating, concealment, acquisition and use of proceeds of crime as criminal activities for the purpose of money laundering.
Chidambaram said while moving the Bill that all the 18 recommendations of Parliament’s standing committee had been accepted by the government.
The finance minister, replying to the issues raised by the members, later said the changes in law would give signal to the international community about India’s commitment to deal with offences having wide international ramifications. The Bill was later approved by voice vote. “Parliament has improved upon the law in 2005, after bringing it in 2002, and then again in 2009 and once again in 2012,” said Chidambaram.
The amendment Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha in December 2011 by then finance minister Pranab Mukherjee and was subsequently referred to the standing committee on finance. Responding to members’ queries on black money, Chidambaram said, “ We are taking action. Every single piece of information ( received from France and other countries) is being investigated and more action would be taken.” He added that prosecution of 37 cases under the money laundering laws have been launched, but no one has either been convicted nor acquitted.
The amendments also seek to introduce the concept of ‘corresponding law’ to link the provisions of Indian law with that of foreign countries.
Chidambaram also clarified that black money and money laundering are two different things. “ We need to have aseparate discussion on black money,” he said.
The finance minister also said that government was initiating steps to fill vacancies in the enforcement directorate (ED) to strengthen it to deal with cases of black money.
The government plans to induct 1,319 additional officers in the ED to increase the strength to 2,064.
Bill enlarges definition of offence, removes fine limit of ₹ 5 lakh
Finance Minister PChidambaram
|
|
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
business standard updates 1-11-2012
Bank HTM cap may be cut
|
BS REPORTER
Mumbai,
31 October
The
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is considering a cut in the held-to-maturity
(HTM) ceiling for banks.
Anand
Sinha, the deputy governor of the RBI, said in a conference call with
researchers and analysts on Tuesday that the RBI is looking into a
recommendation from a central bank committee to cut the HTM ceiling.
“It
is a fact that HTM is on the higher side. We will be looking at it in the
context of cutting down of HTM to improve market liquidity,” said Sinha.
He,
however, did not specify a timeframe as to when the central bank would cut
the ceiling.
Under
HTM, banks hold gilts until its date of maturity. The limit is currently at
25 per cent, but it has traditionally been aligned with banks’ statutory
liquidity ratio (SLR).
The
SLR is the portion of minimum investments in gilts and other approved
securities that banks are supposed to maintain. It was cut by 1 per cent to
23 per cent in July and implemented in August.
|
FinMin
forpartial okay to Shome panel’s retro taxsuggestions
|
VRISHTI BENIWAL
New
Delhi, 31 October
The
finance ministry might dilute the Budget’s income tax provisions with regard
to retrospective taxation and General Anti Avoidance Rules (GAAR) but is not
likely to tow the line of the Parthasarathi Shome panel.
The
panel gave its final report today on retrospective taxation, recommending
foreign companies going for mergers &acquisitions in India should pay tax
only prospectively.
The
Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) is of the view there could be some
practical difficulties in fully accepting the Shome recommendations on both
retrospective taxation and GAAR. It is trying to find a middle path so that
investors’ concerns are addressed without compromising significantly on the
tax revenue to the government in a difficult year. A decision will be taken
by Finance Minister P Chidambaram.
“Some
of the recommendations of the Shome panel are not doable. Retrospective
amendments are not something new. Maybe some of the current provisions of the
Income Tax Act are too harsh and we will try to address those issues,” said a
finance ministry official who didn’t want to be identified.
Officials
said the CBDT might look at scrapping the validation clause and change some
definitions in the I-T Act or GAAR to remove any unintended consequences.
However, if indirect transfers are taxed only prospectively, it faced the
challenge of giving refunds to all those companies which had already paid
tax.
The
ministry was expecting ~35,000 crore to ~40,000 crore by way of retrospective
tax on indirect transfer of Indian assets by non-residents. If the validation
clause is removed, a large part of this will not come to it.
Vodafone,
which had the Supreme Court ruling in its favour, might not have to fear a
tax notice demanding ~8,000 crore on its 2007 deal with Hutchison.
The
Shome panel had said if there was retrospective levy, the tax should be collected
from the seller and the interest and penalty waived. This will also save
Vodafone but the tax department might face many administrative and legal
challenges in collecting tax from Hutchison, the seller in this case.
This
is so because Hutchison does not have operations in India now. THE HURDLES
CBDT is of the view there could be some practical difficulties in fully
accepting the recommendations on both retrospective taxation and GAAR CBDT
might look at scrapping the validation clause and change some definitions in
the I-T Act or GAAR to remove any unintended consequences For GAAR, the panel
recommended postponing it by three years to April 2016, but the I-T dept says
this is too long and the deferral could be for one to two year
The
panel headed by Parthasarathi Shome ( pictured )gave its final report on
Wednesday
|
‘Will
encourage FDI in MSME’
|
BS REPORTER
Mumbai,
31 October
The
new minister for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME), K H Muniyappa,
today said foreign direct investment (FDI) into the sector would be
encouraged. He, however, clarified it would not be at the cost of domestic
players in the sector.
Speaking
to Business Standard, Muniyappa said: “I am in favour of FDI in the MSME
sector, which contributes 40 per cent to India’s exports. FDI, in general, is
essential for the country. The Opposition is opposing it just for the sake of
it.” A ministry official who accompanied the minister during his maiden visit
here said a comprehensive plan on the issue was yet to be prepared. “FDI and
investments from the private sector can be possible in the sector in the
marketing segment, which is currently weak. Further, it can be considered in
the Khadi Reform Development Programme, in which 51 per cent would come from
the private sector. The private sector can have a joint venture in marketing
with FDI partners,” the official said.
|
Centre
wants sickPSUs outfrom free floatnorm
|
SAMIE MODAK
Mumbai,
31 October
The
government plans to seek an exemption for sick public sector undertakings
(PSUs) from compliance with the mandatory public shareholding requirements.
The
finance ministry is likely to ask the equity markets regulator Securities and
Exchange Board of India (Sebi) to give exemptions to companies such as HMT,
Scooters India and Andrew Yule, which have either undergone or are currently
undergoing rehabilitation with the Board for Industrial and Financial
Reconstruction (BIFR).
A
senior official with the Department of Disinvestment (DoD) told Business
Standard
it
would be difficult for PSUs that were sick or under BIFR purview to comply
with the public shareholding norm. He added action had already been initiated
to bring down government holding to the required level in the remaining
companies.
A
final list of companies for which exemption is to be sought from Sebi could
not be obtained from the DoD.
In
the Companies Act, an industrial unit is declared sick if accumulated losses
equal its entire net worth or exceed half its average net worth during the
preceding four years.
The
other condition is a company failing to repay debt in three consecutive
quarters after demand is made in writing for such repayments.
Sick
companies undergo a rehabilitation package with BIFR. However, the legal
process of finalising the package and implementing it is long-drawn and
companies take up to a decade to come out of it.
According
to the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules amendment, all listed
companies should have a minimum public holding of 25 per cent by June 2013.
PSUs have till August 2013 to comply with this norm, and the minimum
threshold for them is just 10 per cent.
Currently,
there are about adozen PSUs with government holding of more than 90 per cent
and the value of stake dilution for these companies would be about ~10,000
crore in all.
Earlier
this month, at a public function, Sebi chairman U K Sinha had said the
government had assured it that PSUs will be complaint with the free-float
requirement before the deadline. He had even said the finance ministry was on
board with it for not extending next years deadline for achieving the 25 per
cent public shareholding requirement.
Some
companies such as Neyveli Lignite, Hindustan Copper and Minerals and Metals
Trading Corporation, where the government will have to bring down its
shareholding below 90 per cent, are already part of this years disinvestment
programme, the target for which is set at ~30,000 crore.
By
the latest data on shareholding, there are about 125 private companies with
promoter holding of more than 75 per cent. These companies will have to
offload shares worth a little over ~19,000 crore in all to meet the mandatory
public shareholding requirement.
To
ask Sebi to exclude firms referred to or seeking BIFR protection BIG STAKES
Currently,
governmenthas over 90% holding in 13 PSUs
Govt
holding Mkt cap Stake to be (in %) (~ cr) offloaded (~ cr) MMTC 99.33 71,270
6,649 Hindustan Copper 99.59 23,149 2,220 Neyveli Lignite 93.56 13,730 489
National Fertilizers 97.64 3,745 286 HMT 98.88 3,205 285 FACT 98.56 1,783 153
ITDC 92.11 4,051 85 RCF 92.50 2,968 74 State Bank of Mysore 92.33 2,329 54
Andrew Yule 93.30 638 21 ITI 92.98 672 20 STC 91.02 1,343 14 Scooters India
95.38 110 6
Source:
BS Research Bureau
|
Equity
trading on MCX-SX to start on Nov 18
|
DILIP KUMAR JHA
Mumbai,
31 October
Newly
recognised equity trading platform, MCX-Stock Exchange (MCX-SX), is set to
kickstart trading in around 1,000 companies’ shares on November 18 — the
Diwali day.
The
company’s board is scheduled to meet on Friday to take a final call on
starting equity trading on this day.
“We
are ready to flag off. But the board, which is to meet on November 2, has to
take a final decision,” said MCX-SX Vice-Chairman Jignesh Shah.
MCX-SX,
which had started its membership drive on September 5 after getting
Securities Exchange Board of India’s (Sebi’s) approval to deal in equity,
futures and options, interest rate derivatives and wholesale debt market, on
October 22, announced it had received over 700 applications for new
memberships.
In
addition to the regular ‘Composite Member Category’, the exchange had
announced the introduction of two new categories —professionally qualified
members and rural entrepreneurship members. These categories were launched
for greater financial inclusion and to harness the potential of domestic
savings through various financial instruments proposed to be provided by the
exchange.
MCX-SX
MD & CEO Joseph Massey termed the response overwhelming. It is a historic
verdict of the public that demonstrates its faith in our ability for
360degree development of financial markets across equity, debt, SME, currency
and other segments.
“With
an all-round subscription from FIIs handling global brokerage houses, securities
firms promoted by financial institutions and banks, companies, retail and
institutional brokers, professionals and rural entrepreneurs, we are
confident to fulfil the government and regulator vision of true capital
formation and employment generation,” he said.
The
exchange has already started the process of getting members registered with
Sebi which involves completing all documentation of members, scrutiny by the
exchange and forwarding the application to Sebi for registration. After Sebi
registers a member, it provides a registration certificate and a unique
registration number. MCX-SX will also begin connectivity enablement of
members with the exchange before subsequently going live.
Board
to take a final call on Friday
Jignesh
Shah, Vice-Chairman, MCX-SX
|
Business standard legal diges 15-10-2012
LEGAL DIGEST
|
>Arbitration plea notpiecemeal: SC
The
Supreme Court last week ruled that an arbitration petition cannot be dealt
with piecemeal by a high court, and it should be considered in its entirety.
In this case, Hindustan Copper Ltd vs Monarch Gold Mining Ltd, one judge of
the Calcutta high court ruled that disputes have arisen for arbitration. He
then referred the issues to the Chief Justice for appointment of an
arbitrator. The chief justice then designated another judge to nominate the
arbitrator. The high court had followed this method adopted in an earlier
case. This procedure was challenged by Hindustan Copper in the Supreme Court.
It held that the procedure followed by the high court was “legally
impermissible”. The function of the chief justice or his designate is
judicial and they should deal with it in its entirety by one of them and “not
by both making it a two-tier procedure”. The high court precedent which was
followed by it in this case was overruled on this legal issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Agri-markets
gettaxrelief
The
Supreme Court has held that contributions made to the market committee fund
by members of the agricultural produce marketing committees in Uttar Pradesh
are not taxable as they are for charitable purposes under the Income Tax Act.
The marketing committees which advance credit facilities to farmers as also
for development works in the area have to defray the expenses out of the
fund. These are statutory duties for the welfare of the members. Therefore,
these activities come within the definition of charitable purposes within the
meaning of Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, the Supreme Court held
while dismissing a large batch of appeals moved by the Commissioner of Income
Tax.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What’s
in a name?
A
wrong title of the ministry created complications for the central government
in pursuing its review petition. In this case, Union of India vs Sandur
Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd, the notice was sent to the “Ministry of Coal
and Mines”, which does not exist. The court registry meant Ministry of Coal,
but due to the mistake it was not served on the right party. The Attorney
General pointed out that the government did not receive notice. Agreeing with
him, the court said that “pronouncing a judgment which adversely affect the
interest of the party who was not given a chance to represent his case is
unacceptable.” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Acquittal
no relief forSBI manager
Even
if a criminal court acquits a bank employee accused of serious fraud, the
disciplinary proceedings against him can be conducted and action can be taken
against him on the same set of facts, the Supreme Court held in the case,
Avinash Bhosale vs Union of India. A senior manager of State Bank of India
was accused of fraudulent transactions to the tune of Rs 12 crore. The
criminal court acquitted him for want of evidence. But that cannot be a
ground for rejecting the finding of the disciplinary authority of the bank.
The conduct of the criminal trial was in the hands of the prosecuting agency.
Having registered the First Information Report, the bank had little or no
role to play, apart from rendering assistance to the prosecuting agencies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
SCappoints
judge as arbitrator
The
Supreme Court has appointed Justice Arvind Savant, former Chief Justice of
the Kerala High Court, as arbitrator in the dispute between Fugro Survey Ltd
and Ramunia International Services Ltd. The two firms had entered into a
survey contract whereby Fugro agreed to perform various surveys. After
completion of the main part of the work, when it demanded payment, there was
no response. Though an arbitrator was proposed by Fugro, there was no
acceptance. Therefore, an arbitration petition was moved first in the Bombay
high court and later in the Supreme Court. The court noted that Ramunia had
not appeared before it. Despite that, it appointed the arbitrator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
United
Breweries writdismissed
A
division bench of the Bombay high court has dismissed a petition of United
Breweries Ltd challenging the higher levy charged by the Maharashtra
Industrial Development Corporation on liquor industries for consumption of
water for commercial use. The corporation had appointed National Environment
Engineering Institute (NEERI) to study the use of water by liquor industries.
The report stated that these industries did not part with their data and
therefore it was handicapped. However, it found that 65 per cent of the water
supplied was for commercial purpose. The corporation then raised the levy by
five times. This was challenged by United Breweries, which had not paid the
rate since 2001. The company also opposed the appointment of NEERI as without
authority. It argued that the employees of the corporation should have done
the task. The high court rejected the contention and said that it was an
independent expert body and the corporation was right in appointing it and
accepting its recommendations. If the company wants to appeal to the Supreme
Court, it has to pay 50 per cent of the demand within two weeks.
MJ
ANTONY
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)